The Shelf Life of the Tech Company CMO

This is a topic that probably isn’t debated all that much. Except for among software and hardware company CMOs & VPs of Marketing! But I think it’s an important management topic nonetheless. How long – and more importantly, how effective- the top marketing executive of your company is will tell a lot about the overall success at most technology companies. So let’s talk about the tenure of a tech company CMO.

Average Tenure of a Tech Company CMO

Let’s start by discussing the typical tenures of the top marketing executives of technology-based businesses. Just a note, I’m lumping the CMO and VP-Marketing designations together for this article.  Although in larger tech companies, there may be both a CMO and VP(s) of Marketing. In the great majority of companies, however, there is one title or the other with essentially similar responsibilities. From this point forward, I’ll refer to the top marketing executive as the “CMO”.

As I stated above, I believe that the length and success of the CMO is highly correlated with success in most businesses. Not just technology companies. First, the good news.  A recent study by Spencer Stuart showed that the average tenure of CMOs at ALL companies – not just tech-based – dropped from 4.3 years in 2024 to 4.1 years in 2025. That’s up from 2 years in the 2004 study, which is when Spencer Stuart first began tracking this metric.

Shorter tenures in tech

Unfortunately, there is another side to the statistics. The bad news is that even among ALL companies, the average CMO tenure of 4.1 years is still dwarfed by the average CEO tenure of 7.6 years. This, of course, isn’t surprising. Firings and other personnel attrition tend to work their way up from the bottom before the top job is affected. But it does point to a lack of “full partnership” between CEOs and their CMOs.

Other studies paint a bleaker picture still for hardware & software company CMOs. The most recent data I can find suggests that tech CMOs typically last approximately 2-3 years, significantly less than the average of CMOs across all industries. The software sector is on the lower end of that range.

If you are interested in tech company management tenure generally, I previously wrote about a similar (if not worse!) situation. That of the tenure and treatment of the tech company VP-Sales function in the article The Tech Company Equivalent of the Canary in the Mineshaft.

Common reasons a CMO succeeds

• They’re smart and effective!
• Good timing; entering the business when things are on the upswing
• Constantly testing new hypotheses even when “riding the wave” because no marketing approach works “forever.”
• Are nimble and open-minded enough to change along with fast-moving technology markets
• Able to use new analytics tools effectively, not only to improve marketing decision-making, but also to support their case to the CEO and other departments. Today, this heavily includes AI.
• If they have the AUTHORITY and resources to get the job done, not just ACCOUNTABILITY if they don’t get results

Common reasons a CMO fails

• Poor fit with corporate culture
• Over-reliance on a single, “silver bullet” marketing method
• Lack of overall support from the CEO
• Inadequate resources/lack of adequate budget to get the job done
• Butting heads with Sales VP
• Butting heads with development VP (if product planning is in the CMO portfolio)
• The CMO job description is “demand creation” only, and the upstream value creation chain within the company doesn’t deliver products that will respond even to well-executed promotional activities
• Today, a lack of staying on the cutting edge of AI tools

The importance of marketing continuity in the digital age

The importance of average tenure is an underrated one in the overall success of technology companies. Indeed, software and hardware businesses generally see more rapid change compared to companies without a strong technology orientation. However, the importance of continuity in the marketing department is often very underrated. A good tech company CMO should be able to improve performance over time. Especially in this digital age, with marketing programs and tools that enable much more effective analysis of marketing performance, crucially with the benefit of historical data.

But this institutional knowledge doesn’t happen overnight. In most cases, it takes some time to characterize what works for a particular company/product line. Let alone establish objective proof of it. A good tech CMO must commit to continuously testing new concepts to keep growth going. But this can lead to pauses/interruptions in meeting short-term goals, when things don’t go as hypothesized. In addition, technology markets have ups and downs. This is due not only to economic factors, but also to product cycles, which can largely affect the ability to consistently create demand. For these reasons, a longer view is advisable when evaluating marketing performance. Not just “what have you done for me lately”. It should certainly be longer than the view being taken if you’re consistently firing a CMO every 2 years.

Best Practices for Tech CMO success

So in summary, if you’re a hardware or software company CEO, how do you best handle the hiring/firing/care & treatment of the CMO role in your tech company? Here are a few suggestions:

1. When you hire a CMO, don’t stick strictly to your trusted network. There isn’t enough truly great marketing talent to go around. If you cast the net too narrowly, you may well not find the best available
2. Make sure that issues with other parts of the company value creation chain–or CEO support–aren’t the real reasons behind perceived marketing deficits
3. Do make CMO decisions on time. Once you decide the CMO isn’t the right person, it makes sense to move swiftly. But don’t make this important decision based solely upon short-term results
4. Take the long view in evaluating marketing. It’s important to remember that CEOs are generally impatient and want results ASAP. But sometimes it takes a while to crack the marketing puzzle.  Marketing results generally should be judged on a longer-term basis than that used by many CEOs
5. Keep in mind that market, product & economic cycles can greatly affect marketing results. Especially in the short run

There you have my view of how a CMO should be viewed, treated, and evaluated within a software or hardware company organization. It’s hard to generalize since job descriptions vary as well as individual company and market circumstances. What do you think? How should the tech company CMO role be evaluated? Post your comments with your perspective.

Follow Phil Morettini and Morettini on Management via Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, RSS, or subscribe to the Morettini on Management Newsletter hosted by LinkedIn. Contact Phil directly at info@pjmconsult.com